Many professional academic journals don’t pay for submissions to their publication. Authors submit papers which share their knowledge, debate issues and contribute to developments in their field. Their reward is being recognised and read by other experts and adds value to future employment opportunities. Like many other forms of writing there are certain guidelines which can contribute to successful publication.
Professional Scope and Audience
Academic authors need to research the publication well before submitting potential queries or completed papers. There are a number of journals relating to all kinds of professions and finding the right home for the right subject matter is the first step. Many journals send out regular calls for papers with specific requirements and deadlines. It is essential to determine what objectives the journal serves and who reads it. A little time spent on research can help shape and mould manuscripts which will interest editors.
Structured Abstracts
Most academic journals now call for structured abstracts. These are short descriptions of the articles content and purpose and could be used as initial queries and pitches to publications. As many journals are now available online, abstracts need to contain key terminology which attract electronic retrieval. A good structure abstract will also allow readers and researchers decide if it is worth them reading on or downloading the full article. Time spent on developing a tight, concise summary of the paper which can stand alone is time well spent.
Language and Style
Most academic papers provide authors guidelines regarding the house style for the publication of papers. This will include the categorisation of papers, for e.g. essays, research paper, point of view, case studies . Each category will have prescribed word counts and requirements. The general rules about clear and unambiguous writing applies to academic papers, if articles are too stuffy and overformal they won’t be accepted. Information about the presentation of tables, data, diagrams and referencing systems will also need to be adhered to.
Reasons for Rejection
There are many reasons for the rejection of papers and many journals have developed robust support frameworks to support authors to avoid this where possible. After all, the journal only exists if it receives professional quality papers. However, there are times when papers are not suitable for the publication including;
- Lack of appropriateness with journal scope – editors will generally provide advice of where to seek alternative publication
- The work does not say anything new on the subject
- Authors are unwilling to work with editors on revisions suggested by reviews
- The publication has already published something similar on the subject.
Editors are usually keen to work with authors in helping to produce a professional academic paper that adds value to their journal. In return authors have the opportunity to demonstrate their expertise with fellow colleagues and improve their potential for promotion.
 |
